Breast Cancer Advice. Keep up to date with the latest information and treatment of breast cancer.
A Member of the Healthscout Network
 Printer Friendly  Send to a Friend

Protein Linked With Poor Prognosis in Early-Stage Breast Cancer

But expression of Ki-67 didn't predict who'd benefit from additional chemo

WEDNESDAY, Jan. 30 (HealthDay News) -- High levels of a protein called Ki-67 are associated with poor prognosis in women with early-stage breast cancer, but this protein may not be useful in identifying patients who would benefit from additional chemotherapy, an Italian study suggests.

Some studies have suggested that breast tumors with a high percentage of tumors cells expressing Ki-67 are more responsive to chemotherapy. This study looked at whether Ki-67 levels predicted responsiveness to chemotherapy in women who'd had surgery for breast cancer.

Advertisement
Related Stories
 border=
Grape Seed Extract Kills Leukemia Cells in Lab
High Insulin May Boost Odds of Breast Cancer
Cancer Medicine Advances on Many Fronts
Related Videos
 border=
A Welcome Message from Survivor PJ Hamel
Smother Says "Cut!"
Maryann and Paula
Related Slides
 border=
Breast Cancer
Breast Self-Exam


Researchers at the University of Milan in Italy assessed Ki-67 expression in tumor samples from women in two randomized clinical trials comparing the use of endocrine therapy alone to endocrine therapy after chemotherapy.

They found that Ki-67 expression didn't predict which women would benefit from chemotherapy prior to endocrine therapy, but they did find that having a high percentage of tumor cells expressing Ki-67 was associated with poorer disease-free survival.

"In this study, Ki-67 [expression] was a prognostic factor, not a predictive factor," the study authors wrote.

The findings were published in the Jan. 29 issue of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

These results support the position of the American Society of Clinical Oncology Tumor Markers Expert Panel that Ki-67 shouldn't be used to make decisions about chemotherapy, Matthew Ellis, of Washington University in St. Louis, wrote in an accompanying editorial.

"Biomarker studies with negative results can be just as important to publish as those with positive results, because clinging to a long-favored but incorrect hypothesis in the face of negative evidence impedes scientific and clinical progress," Ellis wrote.

More information

Breastcancer.org has more about breast cancer treatment.

-- Robert Preidt

SOURCE: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, news release, Jan. 29, 2008

Copyright © 2008 ScoutNews, LLC. All rights reserved.
Last updated 1/30/2008



Disclaimer: The information provided on this website is for educational purposes only and does not serve as a replacement for care provided by your own personal health care team. This website does not render or provide medical advice, and no individual should make any medical decisions or change their health behavior based on information provided here. All pertinent content provided on this website should be discussed with your personal physician to evaluate whether it has any relevance to or impact on your specific condition. Reliance on any information provided by this website is solely at your own risk.


Jan 6, 2009
Home
Search
Powered By HealthLine
New! For timely and trustworth health information, expert advice and much more, visit Breast Cancer Connection
Patient Guide
News
Health Videos
Health Encyclopedia
Health News Archive
Affiliate Information
HealthScout Network
Contact Us
Newsletters
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use

We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health
information:
verify here.
About The HealthScout Network Contact Us
Copyright © 2001. The HealthCentralNetwork, Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy  Terms of Service  

To find more information on specific conditions, please visit our partner sites: